miércoles, 23 de noviembre de 2011

A book critique of The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom

Krashen (1983) is a well known researcher in the field of Second Language Acquisition because he proposed a theoretical model based on five interrelated hypotheses: The Acquisition -Learning Hypothesis, The Natural Order Hypothesis, The Monitor Hypothesis, The Input Hypothesis and The Affective Filter Hypothesis. According to Krashen (1983), “the central hypothesis of the theory is that language acquisition occurs in only one way: by understanding messages” (p. 1). This means that acquisition is based primarily on what we hear and what we understand, not what we talk”
As Krashen (1983) states, “the goal (…) according to this view is to supply comprehensible input, (…) and to bring the student to the point where he or she can understand language outside the classroom” (p.1).
Krashen (1983) also argues,
“the Natural Approach (NA) is based on an empirically grounded theory of second language acquisition and is relatively simple to use and it is easily adapted to a variety of situations (e.g. foreign language, public school, bilingual programs, etc) (p.1).
This careful study presents a formal and academic writing style and it implies a deep analysis of the Second Language Acquisition (SLA) Theory, in which teachers and students are taken into account. This useful book provides not only examples of the theory discussed, but also interesting activities to implement in the language classroom, focused on the four skills (listening, speaking, reading and writing). However, as Krashen (1983) points out, “What looked reasonable to the university professor on paper did not always work out in the classroom” (p.1).
This book consists of seven chapters, a preface and a bibliography.  In the first chapter, Krashen (1983) compares Traditional with Non- Traditional Approaches to Language Teaching. In the second chapter, he introduces The Second Language Acquisition Theory. In the third chapter, he describes the implications of Second Language Acquisition Theory for the Classroom. In the fourth chapter, he explores the way to get started with the Natural Approach. In the fifth chapter, he emphasises on the Oral Communication Development through Acquisition Activities. In the sixth chapter, the author provides Additional Sources of Input for Acquisition and Learning. In the seventh chapter, Krashen suggests Testing and Classroom Management. 
To conclude, this significant book provides a direct test of the Natural Approach from theory to practice, which helps teachers to focus on different techniques through a variety of classroom activities. In this book, Krashen (1983) deeply analyses the Second Language Acquisition Theory through the seven chapters and he also suggests a curriculum organization. That is the reason why The Natural Approach is highly recommended for language teachers and second language learners. However, the application of the theory, the methodology, is not always adequately field-tested. This book should have included other researchers such as Mc Laughlin (1987) or Gregg (1984) who critiqued not only Krashen (1983) distinction between acquisition and learning processes, but also Krashen´s “zero option” for grammar instruction.
























References

Gregg, K. (1984). Krashen’s monitor and Occam’s razor. Applied Linguistics, 5, 79-100. Retrieved November 2011, from http://www.stanford.edu/~kenro/LAU/ICLangLit/NaturalApproach.htm

Krashen, S.D., & Terrell, T.D. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. London, UK: Prentice Hall Europe.

McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of Second Language Learning. London, UK: Edward Arnold. Retrieved November 2011, from http://www.stanford.edu/~kenro/LAU/ICLangLit/NaturalApproach.htm



jueves, 27 de octubre de 2011

My First Teaching Experience

When I was a student from an institute, more or less 4 years ago, I was practicing in a primary school from Berazategui. At that time, I was not working at school so I was not very experienced. I had lessons on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 9 to 10 in the morning. It was a 5th year and the students had a good behaviour, except for one student, who was the leader of the group and had serious discipline problems. He always bothered his classmates and he never did the homework. There were 32 students from a middle social class. I observed the students for two weeks and then I started working. I should deliver ten lessons.
My first impression as a student was that the teacher taught English in a boring way. The teacher spoke English and Spanish to help students understand. Most of the times, he did not use gestures or facial expressions. He used photocopies rather than different resources such as posters or flashcards to make students enjoy the classes. He was so exposed that students could not infer meaning. As Bowers (1987) states, “communicative competence implies that individuals and groups with greater skill in using (and manipulating) the language system will exercise power in naming and thus controlling how others will view social reality" (as cited in Kelly-Kleese, 2004, p.1).
As I had a program to follow, I decided to continue with it. I started working on clothes words and people’s clothes descriptions since they learnt vocabulary about the weather and the four seasons. My teaching goal was to make students aware that English is a language they can use in real life situations. As Giroux (1983) puts it, “language is a social event that is defined, shaped, and constrained by the culture of the setting in which it is used” (Kelly-Kleese, 2001, p.1). My learning goal was not only to teach how to describe people’s clothes, but also to create a set of rules for them to behave properly in class.
My teacher told me to speak English all the time; I did the best to do so, but on many occasions I could not. I was doing great since it was my third week. Students continued having bad behaviour but at least they did not run away from the class. The rebel student, who never spoke English during my observation classes, participated in class. It was really amazing for me that at least he could speak a word in English. On the fifth week, I had to evaluate them, during the first hour students had to describe orally their own clothes and on the second they had the written test.
 Before leaving, students gave me letters and nice drawings. The leader of the group was one of them, I could not believe it. The things they told me were amazing. I was very happy because it was a nice experience as a teacher I have had in my career. The following class I returned to give the exams back and I also wrote a very emotive letter telling students about my feelings towards them. I was very sad to say good bye but that was it. I know that they learned a lot of vocabulary and structures, they did it great in the exam, but I learned more than them. I learned that whatever you give, then nicer things will give back to you.

























References

Kelly-Kleese, C. (2001). Editor´s Choice: An Open Memo to Community College Faculty and Administrators. Community College Review. Retrieved September 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_1_29/ai_77481463.

Kelly-Kleese, C. (2004). UCLA Community College Review: Community College Scholarship and Discourse. Community College Review Retrieved September 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_1_32/ai_n6361541.


Reflecting on Critical Incidents


At present, there is a deep necessity to reflect upon the teacher education and teachers´ practices through professional judgement. Critical Incidents (CI) are tools developed for teacher self development which imply to overcome different classroom events. "La reflexion es el eje que relaciona, confronta, diferencia e interioriza ideas nuevas con las anteriores" ( Marcelo, 1996; Day, 1994).
González, Escartín and Pérez (2003) point out:
 “Critical incidents are described as a pre-service and in- service teacher education strategy. The idea is to integrate theory and practice. The diversity of teachers and the possibility for the reflexive analysis of classrooms events, often solved in a spontaneous way, are the basis of this powerful strategy” (p. 101).
Nowadays, the relationship between teacher and students has changed due to the social changes of the society and the education. Professional teachers are those who promote social interaction and analyse classroom difficulties through the use of the critical incidents. As Fernández and Fernández (1994) state, “Incidente critico es una estrategia  estructurada y en la cual se presenta a profesores situaciones escritas de la enseñanza (una o varias frases, un párrafo, una página,…) y se les pide que tomen una decisión en función de la información que se les proporciona (…)” (p.93).
In fact, the actual challenge is the improvement of the teacher education through the design of a curriculum in which contents and critical incidents are parts of the teachers´ knowledge. Critical incidents imply a context, a problem, causes and solutions. According to González, Escartín and Pérez (2003), “El tratamiento de incidentes críticos es apropiado para ejercitar una dinámica de grupo donde el profesor novel explicita su posicionamiento acerca de muchos tópicos recurrentes en la docencia” (p. 105).                                                                                                
To conclude, not only pre- service teachers but also in- service teachers take advantage of critical incidents as a powerful tool. It is very important to create a good atmosphere in the classroom among teacher and students and among students through constant feedback in order to face any difficulty which may arises within the classroom. That is the reason why critical incidents are relevant in the teaching-learning process because they contribute to personal and professional development.






References
Fernández González, J., Elórtegui Escartín, N & Medina Pérez, M. (2003). “Los incidentes críticos en la formación y perfeccionamiento del profesorado de secundaria de Ciencias de la Naturaleza”. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formaciòn del Profesorado, año/vol.1, número 001. Universidad de Zaragoza. Zaragoza,  España 101-112. Retrieved October 2011, from http://redalyc.uaemex.ms

Fernández, T & Fernández, J. (1994). “Técnica de trabajo con profesores sobre su practica docente:< Terapia de Knoll>”. Retrieved October 2011, from Investigación en la  escuela, 22,91-103.


miércoles, 12 de octubre de 2011

EAP DISCOURSE COMMUNITY

The importance of a discourse community

Swales (1980) establishes some basic criteria to recognize as well as to check whether a particular group of people belongs to an academic discourse community or not (as cited in Pintos & Crimi, 2010, p.13).
An evidence of common goals is identified as Kelly- Kleese (2001) indicates “increasing perceptions of community college communicative competence, and moving its professionals into positions of legitimate power within the larger higher education discourse community” (as cited in Editor’s Choice: An Open Memo to Community College Faculty and Administrators, 2001, p. 1)
As regards participatory mechanisms, Kelly –Kleese (2001) also states that “language can help you meet these goals through an understanding of the community college as a discourse community (p.1)
Apart from these goals; another important characteristic is the information exchange among members of a discourse community. The idea of what is learned and how learning takes place are determinants of people’s interactions. As Soltis (1981) points out  “the sociocentric view of knowledge and learning holds that what we take as knowledge and how we think and express ideas are the products of the interactions of groups of people over time” (as cited in Teachers need teachers to grow, 2004, p.1 )
Learning must be authentic and connected to the teachers’ classroom practice in order to be meaningful. That is the reason why community-specific genres are essential within a discourse community.
The discourse community may use shared and specialized terminology.  Kelly-Kleese (2001) has suggested that the community members share their knowledge and interpretations and thus create policy and redefine language. The term "open door", for example, has acquired a specific meaning within the college discourse community, meaning that any high education graduate can access postsecondary education ( p.1)
To achieve a high general level of expertise, McLaughlin & Talbert (1993) indicate “collaborative culture and an environment that supports risk-taking and reflection are required by any discourse community” (p.15)
To conclude, language learning is a social activity which implies people’s interaction. Understanding the community college as a discourse community means that their members are intercommunicated and it is helpful to move community college professionals into positions of legitimate power, increasing their esteem within that community.





































References
Pintos, V. & Crimi, Y. (2010). Building up a community of teachers and prospective researchers. Universidad CAECE

Kelly-Kleese, C. (2001). Editor’s Choice: An Open Memo to Community College Faculty and Administrators. Community College Review. Retrieved September 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_1_29/ai_77481463

Wenzlaff, T. L., & Wieseman, K. C. (2004). Teachers Need Teachers To Grow. Teacher Education Quarterly. Retrieved September 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3960/is_200404/ai_n9349405

Kelly-Kleese, C (2004) UCLA Community College Review: community college scholarship and discourse. Community College Review Retrieved September 2011, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_1_32/ai_n6361541

martes, 11 de octubre de 2011

THE WORLD OF ACADEMIC WRITING

The aim of this blog is to share works about academic writing. I expect to interact with other colleagues and share opinions and feelings about our daily teaching practice.


Welcome message!
Hello everyone! My name is Carolina Denicola and I live in Florencio Varela, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
In this blog I will publish my papers in order to share them with the members of this discourse community and I also expect to learn from your contributions.
Thank you for visiting my blog!


Warmest,
Carolina Denicola.